|
 |


6/10/2008
Lance Burri: The blame game in Janesville
When media around the state compile their Biggest Stories of 2008 this December, the Janesville GM plant closure will almost certainly – floods notwithstanding – be on the list. For almost a century, GM has been a fixture in Janesville – a major employer, and more. But unless something changes between now and 2010, that’ll end. Twenty-four hundred people will lose their jobs, and that’s just the start of the economic ripples.
I won’t try to impress you with my heartfelt feelings for the people, the community, what it means for our wider economy, etc. It’s scary. To work in one place for decades, for generations, just to have it yanked away?
It's like facing one's own mortality. Scary.
Still, I’m confused. Everyone seems to be upset – even angry about the closing. Surely someone must be pleased.
Someone. Environmentalists. Progressives. Al Gore.
Where are the tree-hugging bike-riding tofu-eating vegans to tell us: we really are sorry about your jobs, but we had to shut you down eventually. For the good of the planet.
Let’s not forget: that GM plant makes sport utility vehicles. SUVs. Big, heavy machines that get lousy gas mileage and churn out far more greenhouse gases than their smaller cousins, particularly their smaller half-vegetarian cousins.
The plant is shutting down because demand for those vehicles is down. Less demand means fewer of them on the road, which means lower emissions, and less gasoline. From an Earth First viewpoint, an environmental viewpoint, a liberal Democrat viewpoint, this is a good thing.
Isn’t it?
Not according to Russ Feingold and Jim Doyle. That Janesville will no longer build those poisonous death machines is a tragedy, in their view, and rest assured, they’re demanding more money for worker retraining and damn those GM executives for not retooling the plant to make other, smaller, less costly models. Damn them for not acting faster to counteract rising gas prices.
Damn them, in other words, for not compensating for liberal political policies.
Why is the GM plant closing? One big reason: gas prices. Higher gas prices are cutting into disposable income, meaning fewer purchases of big, expensive trucks – particularly big, expensive trucks that use more gas and, thus, cut into disposable income.
We could, or course, drill more. Open up new sources of oil. Build new refineries. Ten years ago.
But remind me: on which side of that debate do Democrats fall?
Democrats are allies of radical environmentalism: of people and groups who oppose developing new sources of oil.
Democrats are also allies of government nannyism: piling requirements on industry – automakers included – that make products, like SUVs, more expensive. More taxes. More regulations. More mandates. Business is there to feed government, and by God we’re going to make them!
They want higher gas taxes. They want more expensive gasoline. They want SUVs off the road. Thus, they want the Janesville plant to stop making SUVs. Not in so many words, maybe. But that’s the logical end to the environmentalist – Democrat – agenda.
So. Why haven't we heard much about that? There are so many potential explanations, I’m not sure which I prefer.
Could be simply politicians being politicians, saying the right thing at the right time.
Or, could be, they never thought the whole "green" thing through. Not to its logical conclusion.
Or, could be, they don't really believe the environmentalist gospel. The doomsaying. The angst. Could be they find Al Gore as hilarious as we conservatives do, and their convenient political alliance with environmentalists is just that: a convenient political alliance.
Whichever. Highly-placed Democrats now want credit for caring. But in Janesville, it's too late.
Lance Burri is a contributor to the Badger Blog Alliance and occasionally blogs at his own site as well.
COMMENTS
It is clear that GM management lost the race, not GM workers and not Toyota and Honda. It is also a fact that regardless of what domestic sources of oil and refining could have been developed the impact on world price of oil would be minimal and short lived. Face the facts Lance, oil is a non-renewable resource and everyone in the world (with exception of some backward dictatorial oil exporters and US companies) has planned for the end of cheap oil. It may make you feel good to try to tar the "environmentalists" with closing the GM plant but you are factually wrong. Place the blame where it belongs:
A) GM short term profits at the expense of long term profitability
B) high wage costs
C) high health care costs
Gm and the other US auto manufacturers and their unions were more than happy to gorge themselves on big car profits while it lasted.

dave allen (Tue Jun 10 07:35:27 2008)
There are Environmentalists, and there are environmentalists. The Environmentalists are usually supremely wealthy, and have no clue. E.g. the Sierra Club, who picked a Chevy Tahoe as "green" car of the year--its mileage is supposed to be 20 mpg!
Or how about Prince Charles who flies around proclaiming the "green" message--air travel causes MUCH higher emissions than boat or car. Plus, he likes to use gas-guzzling Bentleys for cars.
How about Paul McCartney's Lexus LS600H, which was FLOWN to him!?! There is a website. www.CO2balance.com, that has a calculator. I entered "10 people" (assuming that each one weighed 200 lb, and the Lexus weighed 2000 lb) and came up with 16.2 tonnes CO2, versus driving around the equator in a CAR, which is 7.34 tonnes. It was probably much more than that, as we don't know exactly how much the Lexus weighs, or how much weight they allow for a person--what if it was 180 lb instead of 200? And besides, I believe the Lexus is supposed to get only 21 mpg.
Then there are the environmentalists, like me, who are simply trying to raise livestock sensibly. My hubbie's old Ford still gets 35 mpg. We worry about the loss of FARMLAND--a most important non-renewable resource, which unlike oil, can NOT be replaced by anything else. We are concerned re big-govt policies which are designed to force small producers out of business, while benefiting factory farms.
What'll happen when the big mono-croppers and factory farms run out of fuel!? What'll happen when so much farmland is lost to wasteful subdivisions and malls, that we can't grow what we need anymore?

emily matthews (Tue Jun 10 10:04:45 2008)
GM, along with a host of people and companies, are encountering a harsh reality when it comes to sensible policies and resource management.
Emily-That is a fantastic point about the Tahoe. What a joke that "hybrid" is. While it is a great proof of concept, it is far too fuel inefficient and expensive (topping $60,000 in many cases) to be worth marketing. If I see one on the highways around here I'll be floored.
I have a number of friends who live in Janesville--some of whom have parents that work for GM--and I'm very concerned about the city. Janesville, tragically, has nothing to fall back on if GM does ultimately shut down. (Not unlike Lansing, MI--which is still struggling.)
At least Janesville has some great infrastructure to utilize (such as a robust rail system thanks to GM) if they finally are able to retool the city. (Pardon the pun!)
GM has done wonders for the City--and consequently will be its downfall. And as far as I'm concerned, the fault falls squarely on GM (and the other Big Three auto makers) for lagging behind on sane automotive decisions and refusing to modernize. Janesville will survive--but it will never be the same again.

Adam Delikowski (Tue Jun 10 10:16:12 2008)
Dear Mr. Burri:
I just read your article on the pending closure of the plant in Janesville earlier this month. As an environmentally conscious individual, the closure of this plant gave me no sense of victory at all, even with the possible reduction of not demise of the wasteful, polluting, gas-guzzling monstrosities that are Sports-Utility-Vehicles.
It has been a very troubling development when it comes to the fact that GM has been steadfastly refusing to UPGRADE their vehicle stock and diversify their manufacturing base and implement far more fuel-efficient vehicles. Same goes for Ford. Both of them are seeing their fortunes rapidly decline.
Feingold, Doyle, Baldwin, Kagen, none of them are to blame for this terrible economic calamity unfolding before our computer screens. In fact, it is the beginnig of the consequences of GM's short-sighted quest for profits at the complete expense of the long-term opportunity of retooling their plants and converting them into hybrid, or electric automobile plants. Honda and Toyota have been producing very fuel-efficient vehicles from pure-petro to hybride to even zero-petroleum vehicles and yet those two companies' fortunes have been soaring while Ford and GM continue their rapid descent into the toilet-bowl.
I really am upset as hell at the news of the plant's closing and and am scared at the prospect of Janesville turning into the Flint of Wisconsin.
This is just another consequence of the increasing influences of government and big businesses converging. It has damaged the efficiency of both and turning a blind eye to the big picture: Many people worldwide even those who are still escaping the gas-price pinch are no longer buying GM's gas-guzzlers anymore. Honda and Toyota are seeing improving fortunes.
It is bad economics at its worst and now many of us are now paying for it. It could be enough to bring GM down like a giant dinosaur.
As I travel around Menasha, Neenah, Appleton, Little Chute, Kaukauna, I have a sad worry that every one of the industrial facilities that I see around me will shutter and not be reoccupied. For all the horrors of September 11, 2001, it pales into insignificence in comparison to the depressing effects both socially and economically of seeing industries of all kinds go and nothing left to replace them.
Janesville should implement a plan at converting the plant into a bicycle manufacturing facility because gas prices are causing lots more people to bike to and from work. I ride my bike around town and feel great knowing how much I save on gas. Petroleum can be mostly confined to colder times of the year when conditions are unsuitable for biking.
With bicycle sales booming all across the country due to gas prices, this plant in Janesville could see a whole different era dawn, one that could transform Janesville and preventing it from becoming a Flint or mini-Detroit.

Mike C. (Mon Jun 16 04:10:07 2008)
|
 |


Blog Archives
| 2010 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2008 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2007 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
| 2000 |
 May
|
|