fox cities news, appleton, wi
foxpolitics.netwhats really going on in the fox cities
fox cities newsfox cities news, appleton, wi


Blogroll
Selected News Sources:
Business Jrnl of Milw
Christian Science Monitor
Daily Caller
Drudge Report
La Crosse Tribune
Milw Journal Sentinel
National Journal
New York Times
Public Policy Forum
Real Clear Politics
Stateline
The Hill
TPM
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
WI State Journal
Selected Blogs - from the Right:
American Mind
Blaska's Blog
Boots & Sabers
Charlie Sykes
Dad29
Freedom Eden
Heritage Foundation
Jerry Bader Blog
Life Voice
Marketplace of Ideas
Marquette Warrior
Natl Review Online
No Runny Eggs
Patrick McIlheran
Real Debate Wisconson
RedState
Rhymes with Clown
Shark and Shepherd
The Lote Tree
Vox Populi
Wall Street Jrnl, Opinions
WI State Jrnl, Opinion
Wigderson Library & Pub
Wisconsin Family Voice
WPRI
Selected Blogs - from the Left:
Big Money Blog
Blogging Blue
Brenda Konkel
Caffeinated Politics
Capital Times
FightingBob
Folkbum's rambles
Griper Blade
Huffington Post
Lost Albatross
MAL Contends
Mid coast views
Moneyed Politicians
One Wisconsin Now
Open Left
Playground Politics
Political Environment
Rock Netroots
Talk to Tony
Uppity Wisconsin
Waxing America
fox cities news, appleton, wi fox cities news, appleton, wi
Today's Blog: Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie
My husband and I and a couple hundred friends watched in Green Bay as ...(more)

Blogs
  • Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie (6/28/2011)
  • Time for Gov. Walker to talk more about the cake (3/4/2011)
  • Today, reality hits home (3/1/2011)
  • FoxPolitics News going on hiatus (1/28/2011)
  • Brown County Executive candidate forum Feb. 8 (1/28/2011)
  • Education done right (1/27/2011)
  • To Obama, the ‘We’ is Government (1/27/2011)
  • (more)



    9/17/2008
    Lasee: Can you spare a dime (or some time)?

    After writing about schools and education, I received emails from people of the more liberal persuasion, arguing for more government programs for even younger children. Their reasoning (feeling?) goes if the parents aren’t doing their job (yes, it is a job with real duties) raising children, society would be better off with more programs. They usually argue more taxes and spending today will save money tomorrow, somehow.

    Some believe that right from the moment children are born, the state should parent for those parents who don’t or can’t do their parenting job. Since we can’t judge the quality of parents (it might make some people feel bad), the government should parent all children. Of course, we aren’t supposed to talk about the money that will cost. After all, it is for the children and society, according to them.

    This line of reasoning comes from the belief that a system can and does care for children (everyone). We need additional programs, because we don’t want kids to suffer or fail to reach their full potential (whatever that means). So the government needs to step in and do more for all the kids. Why stop at only those kids that truly need help. Those kids will feel bad about themselves for being singled (grouped) out for more systemic help.

    A different suggestion, respectfully offered, to liberals is that they do their part in addition to sending their money to the Internal Revenue Service (taxes). They should give money and time to organizations that are helping kids succeed, like Big Brothers Big Sisters. They do a wonderful job, making a real difference in real children’s lives, one at a time (they have a private system to do it, too).

    What I find interesting is the thought that only a new or expanded government program can make the differences that are needed.

    In a book recommended to me by one of my Notes readers, Who Really Cares by Arthur C. Brooks, the author points out that government spending “crowds out” private giving. “Big government” tax and spend liberalism, has less impact on people’s welfare than private giving; government programs relieve us of personal responsibility of caring for others as individuals. This leads to an “I gave (forced giving) through my taxes” attitude.

    Food for thought. Private charity keeps us connected with our community in a way that government spending can never accomplish. I find it interesting that liberals want the government to step in and fill every need (so they don’t personally have to?). Arthur Brooks points out that conservatives give more generously (at all income levels) than liberals. I wonder why this is… Perhaps it is the belief by some that most government programs are cost effective, efficient, and well designed. Perhaps it feels better when the other guy is forced to give through taxes even if he wants to spend it on his or her family, kids and personal needs and desires.

    It is interesting that those who want less government give more than those who want bigger (more expensive) government. Maybe this is because liberals give at the altar of their government.

    Frank Lasee is a Republican and represents the 2nd Assembly District.





    fox cities news, appleton, wi

    sign up to receive fox politics news
    see todays issue


    Blog Archives
    2011
    June
    March
    January
    2010
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2009
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2008
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2007
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2006
    December
    November
    October
    September
    2000
    May

    Site Map | Privacy Policy   •   FoxPolitics ©2006 All Rights Reserved.   •   Site Updated 5/24/2013