fox cities news, appleton, wi
foxpolitics.netwhats really going on in the fox cities
fox cities newsfox cities news, appleton, wi


Blogroll
Selected News Sources:
Business Jrnl of Milw
Christian Science Monitor
Daily Caller
Drudge Report
La Crosse Tribune
Milw Journal Sentinel
National Journal
New York Times
Public Policy Forum
Real Clear Politics
Stateline
The Hill
TPM
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times
WI State Journal
Selected Blogs - from the Right:
American Mind
Blaska's Blog
Boots & Sabers
Charlie Sykes
Dad29
Freedom Eden
Heritage Foundation
Jerry Bader Blog
Life Voice
Marketplace of Ideas
Marquette Warrior
Natl Review Online
No Runny Eggs
Patrick McIlheran
Real Debate Wisconson
RedState
Rhymes with Clown
Shark and Shepherd
The Lote Tree
Vox Populi
Wall Street Jrnl, Opinions
WI State Jrnl, Opinion
Wigderson Library & Pub
Wisconsin Family Voice
WPRI
Selected Blogs - from the Left:
Big Money Blog
Blogging Blue
Brenda Konkel
Caffeinated Politics
Capital Times
FightingBob
Folkbum's rambles
Griper Blade
Huffington Post
Lost Albatross
MAL Contends
Mid coast views
Moneyed Politicians
One Wisconsin Now
Open Left
Playground Politics
Political Environment
Rock Netroots
Talk to Tony
Uppity Wisconsin
Waxing America
fox cities news, appleton, wi fox cities news, appleton, wi
Today's Blog: Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie
My husband and I and a couple hundred friends watched in Green Bay as ...(more)

Blogs
  • Time for the Guv to morph into Chris Christie (6/28/2011)
  • Time for Gov. Walker to talk more about the cake (3/4/2011)
  • Today, reality hits home (3/1/2011)
  • FoxPolitics News going on hiatus (1/28/2011)
  • Brown County Executive candidate forum Feb. 8 (1/28/2011)
  • Education done right (1/27/2011)
  • To Obama, the ‘We’ is Government (1/27/2011)
  • (more)



    1/23/2009
    Just say NO to the stimulus plan

    Americans for Prosperity is conducting a grassroots campaign to stop the American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of 2009, urging Americans to contact their U.S. Senators and Representatives in opposition to the trillion dollar government “stimulus plan.”

    Below are “No Stimulus” Talking Points shared via http://nostimulus.com, a project of Americans for Prosperity. The site also provides an opportunity to sign an online petition opposing the “stimulus plan” as well as aids in contacting your elected officials.
    1. Every dollar the government spends comes from the private sector. Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman famously said: "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch." Government spending is either financed through higher taxes, higher federal borrowing, or by printing money. Those are the only possibilities. They all create greater economic damage than any stimulus effect of new spending.
    • Tax increases lower the incentive to work, save, and invest. There is a strong association between tax increases and reduced economic growth. In an economic crisis, tax hikes should be unthinkable. The Revenue Act of 1932 was one of the major reasons an economic crisis deepened into the Great Depression.
    • Government borrowing also takes money out of the private economy—the money that bond purchasers hand over to the government in exchange for the bonds. That money could otherwise be used for business investment that would expand the economy’s productive capacity. If the funds are borrowed from abroad, our exports are lowered because U.S. dollars are being used to buy bonds instead of goods. Borrowed funds also have to be paid back, placing a burden on future taxpayers. Excessive borrowing also may increase interest rates, deepening the credit crisis.
    • Inflation may be most damaging financing mechanism of all. If government spends money that it hasn’t taxed or borrowed, then it is literally creating money out of thin air. More dollars being created means that the dollars in our pockets and bank accounts are worth less than they were before. Inflation is a stealth tax that erodes the value of everything and destroys real economic growth.
    2. History shows spending stimulus fails.
    America experimented with large-scale expansions of government spending in the 1930s with the New Deal and again in the 1960s and 70s with the Great Society. These dramatic expansions of government spending coincided with economic failure. The long-boom that started under Reagan and continued until now with only a couple of brief, mild recessions coincided with a significant decline in federal spending as a percentage of the economy.

    3. Infrastructure projects should be judged on their merits, but not as stimulus.
    There is a role for government in providing certain public goods that the market cannot efficiently provide. If financing is available at favorable rates it may make sense to take a long-term view and begin projects that are legitimately justified on their merits. We should be under no misconception, however, that public works spending is stimulative, because borrowed dollars are taken out of the private sector.
    Jo Egelhoff, FoxPolitics.net




    COMMENTS

    It appears that the whining and gnashing of teeth has begun in light of a new administration. Now begins the calling up of the image of the sainted Ronald Reagan in these conservative spaces for the good old days.

    While the stimulus package continues to be debated I have no reason to think that recent reports of Governor Doyle's case to Congress for the State of Wisconsin for Medicare and Medicaid and other social welfare programs (which is the welfare of society and children) is misinformed.

    If there is an objection to the stimulus package at all it should be in the larger sphere of who benefits in the corporate sector and in the "growth industries" now threatened and rightly so with slowdowns, halts or outright failure. The profligacy and waste of our development will be evident as the for sale signs go up.

    With regard to infrastructure the stimulus should only apply to the public infrastructure not propping up make work improvements for the corporate welfare of free roads, free sewerage and other enhancements which cities have no duty
    to provide.

    During the all the adulation of the inauguration, the news has stealthily reported the failure of the second largest electronics retailer after Best Buy. Circuit City will be closing all of its stores. 30 plus thousand people will be out of work. This should be a warning and a lesson. The lesson is that there are better ways to provide products and services.

    Lastly the stimulus should be contingent on restoring the tax rates levied on those of extreme wealth.

    There are no martyrs in the top one percent of the wealth class. The end times are not at hand because the wealthy won't have enough money.

    And please don't use the phrase "It would tear the country apart" if these actions are taken.

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Lon Ponschock (Fri Jan 23 10:55:35 2009)

    Gosh Lon, can you be any more melodramatic? Circuit City?
    Answers Lon, how about concrete (forgive the pun) answers. Specifically what, in your view, would qualify for Wisconsin public infrastructure projects (which will give more big corporations more work - beware) that are ok to spend this "free" bailout money on - your tax dollar and mine and our children's and our grandchildren's on?

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Jo (Fri Jan 23 15:04:26)

    Melodrama is good; like greed I suppose if Gordon Gekko is now the model and ideal.

    Infrastructure projects which help to abet rather an allay societal problems of "growth" and by logical extension the corporate sphere are those which would enhance or provide give-backs to
    corporate enterprise. These are the usual city give backs to big box stores located out on highways and byways where free off ramps, sewerage, electric and water are used as part of the deal to build.

    Local examples of the wrong sort infrastructure opportunities would be the new development in Neenah and the
    new proposed Shopko in Oshkosh. And Riverheath.

    What is needed is to carefully go over that list of 260 projects from the Regional Planning Commission and then find the ones, if any, that fix not enhance present facilities.

    More to the point of payment, the stimulus should be paid for by those revenues which have been taken out of the public access by tax cuts.

    If individuals would look at the language of the (cough) non-melodramatic Republicans they would see and hear this language trope: Every new tax cut becomes the base. So the last tax cut if reversed is a tax increase. Do you see how these stairs are used to obfuscate the fact that the tax rate for rich people has dwindled to practically nothing through this dodge?

    That's why I would insist that the stimulus be paid for by policy reversal and also retroactive payments for the tax policy that is in place.

    It's like Obama overturning the torture "legal opinions" created by John Yoo. It probably can be done by decree but would more likely take the form of legislation. Because of the lack of
    civic involvement other than wanting to go to Obamastock and watch a coronation with tunes by U2 and Springsteen, this sort of civic involvement doesn't exist. And our representatives (like those Tom Frank talks about) vote against the best interests of the majority. That means everybody.

    As previously noted, Kagen and Feingold have been on the side of voting against with regard to bailouts. What will happen with the stimuli remains to be seen.

    fox cities news, appleton, wi
    Lon Ponschock (Sat Jan 24 11:59:14 2009)




    fox cities news, appleton, wi

    sign up to receive fox politics news
    see todays issue


    Blog Archives
    2011
    June
    March
    January
    2010
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2009
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2008
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2007
    December
    November
    October
    September
    August
    July
    June
    May
    April
    March
    February
    January
    2006
    December
    November
    October
    September
    2000
    May

    Site Map | Privacy Policy   •   FoxPolitics ©2006 All Rights Reserved.   •   Site Updated 5/23/2013