|
 |


6/1/2010
How nonpartisan is the League of Women Voters?
A friend of mine calls the League of Women Voters just another feel-good club for women. (Well, I’ve heard it called worse.) In a piece over the holiday, the Green Bay Press Gazette calls the League “a vital community organization” in celebration of the national organization’s 90th birthday celebration this year. (Emphases below were added by me.)
Known primarily for its voter education efforts, the national League of Women Voters was created after the passage of the 19th amendment gave women the right to vote as a way to continue the efforts of the suffrage movement. The organization has had a local chapter or chapters in Brown County since 1929.
One of the league's primary efforts has always been to increase voter participation, McCollum said. The group holds candidate forums, registers voters and promotes citizen involvement in local government.
"We are a nonpartisan organization, so we do not endorse candidates," McCollum said.
However, the organization advocates positions on national issues like immigration, health care and the environment as well as local issues like advocating for a countywide library.
…. Later this summer, for example, the group plans to hold an education session for people in the community about the impact of the health-care reform law.
As part of the national league effort to reach a consensus position on immigration, the local chapter undertook a study of the impact of immigration in the community several years ago, said Helen Schwartz, the member who led the study.
The League’s Position on Immigration is here.
In achieving overall policy goals, the League supports a system for unauthorized immigrants already in the country to earn legal status, including citizenship, by paying taxes, learning English, studying civics and meeting other relevant criteria. While policy reforms, including a path to legal status, remain unachieved, the League does not support deporting unauthorized immigrants who have no history of criminal activity.
The League’s Position on Health Care is here.
The position calls for a national health insurance plan financed through general taxes, commonly known as the “single-payer” approach. The position also supports an employer-based system that provides universal access to health care as an important step toward a national health insurance plan. The League opposes a strictly private market-based model of financing the health care system. With regard to administration of the U.S. health care system, the League supports a combination of private and public sectors or a combination of federal, state and/or regional agencies. The League supports a general income tax increase to finance national health care reform.
An Action Alert on Global Climate Change is here.
The League of Women Voters believes that comprehensive legislation on energy and the environment must be the next major item on the Senate’s agenda. The legislation recently developed by Senator Kerry and Senator Lieberman can serve as the basis for this important debate.
The scientific evidence is clear that climate change, due largely to human emissions of greenhouse gases, is here now, causing increasingly severe droughts and heat waves in some areas, intensifying floods and hurricanes in others, and triggering more wildfires. Climate change can devastate crops, create drinking water shortages, displace millions of people because of floods and increase the spread of infectious diseases like malaria.
Help me with this. How does the League garner such great credibility as a non-biased community educator when it advocates, takes positions on the controversial issues it does?
Jo Egelhoff, FoxPolitics.net
COMMENTS
Jo, I separate non-profits by looking at who funds them and for why. If they are funded by fat cats who want in the taxpayer's pocket and foster payola to politicians, I think they are doing more harm to the nation than good. I don't see a Big Daddy behind the League and generally agree with their positions. When I see something from WPRI or the like I consider the source, which is often the rich who want to get richer and use "big government taxes" as their bad guy that must be killed.
My preference is complete disclosure on funding, then let the public decide.

Jack Lohman (Tue Jun 01 07:58:49 2010)
To claim the League is non-partisan is ludicrous. They may as well call themselves the League of Democrat Women Voters. I can't remember the last time I heard them claim any idea that is remotely attached to a conservative way of thinking.

C.R. Stevenson (Tue Jun 01 08:06:01 2010)
I must agree with C.R. Stevenson. Having been involved with the League of Women Voters off and on since the 1960's, it has clearly evolved into a very liberal organization. And I haven't seen a "conservative" position taken/stated by the League in a very long time. Babs

Babs (Tue Jun 01 12:37:32 2010)
Not a surprise Jo !
Like many Liberal thinking associations, they are formed with innocent names.
The League has had a "socialistic" endevor since it's founding.
When the 19 th "Womans vote" Amendment was in the bag, The Suffrage Organization was not needed, but that resulted in the birth of a new group determined to address altruistic "human needs" and that was the WLV.
The view of the LWV is far left.
While not functional in time for the 19th amendment, they did get the very first social reform through Congress with the "Sheppard-Towner Act (1921), which provided federal aid for maternal and child care programs. That was the first federally funded social welfare measure in the United States " !!!
They are strongly anti-gun and pro about everything liberals dream of, like abortion, social welfare and immigration.
Just like politicians, who refuse to call taxes what they are-- "Taxes" but instead call them "investments", the league is about organizing Woman for liberal agendas, and not unbiased to say the least in that endevor.
Ensuring the vote, means for their purposes of course !

Rich Carlstedt (Tue Jun 01 14:14:38 2010)
Innocent names? Yea, like "Americans for Prosperity" and other fat cat organizations that want in the taxpayer's pocket.

Jack Lohman (Tue Jun 01 19:08:48 2010)
Ah, and now there's "Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation"... I love it!

Jack Lohman (Wed Jun 02 08:38:31 2010)
But Jack, you miss the point completely. The League of Women Voters occupies almost an exclusive stage, seen by most Americans (?) as the sacred altar of the responsibility and right to vote in America. Because of this electoral advocacy, LWV is highly regarded by many and highly credible. These groups you mention yes, call themselves nonpartisan, but very clearly in their mission statements, note a bias in political and usually economic philosophy and theory. The LWV's positions are most often left of center - that needs be acknowledged.

Jo (Wed Jun 02:09:19:26 2010)
I indeed acknowledge that, Jo. But they are "highly regarded by many" because they are not funded by the fat cats that want in the taxpayer's pockets. Those who want freedom to do as they want and to transfer wealth from the little guy to their own pockets, are some day going to regret that they got what they wanted. There will be a deadly rebellion, and I hope I'm gone before that happens.
My big complaint is that if we did not have corrupt politicians on the payroll of the elites, taking bribes to do the wrong thing, we would not have needed groups like the League to battle for the little guys. The politicians would simply do what is in the best interest of the country... do what they are being paid by the taxpayers to do. Political bribes are not needed to do the right thing.

Jack Lohman (Wed Jun 02 09:54:52 2010)
|
 |


Blog Archives
| 2010 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2008 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2007 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
| 2000 |
 May
|
|