|
 |


8/18/2008
Spending controls: If the state won't do it - YOU do it
Most anyone’s crystal ball will tell you that neither Governor Doyle nor the democratic-controlled Senate will bring up spending limits on itself. [This article was originally published October 16, 2007.]
The state does limit school spending, and to a certain extent, county revenues. But for municipalities, only a voluntary “Expenditure Restraint Program” is in place – and it has holes big enough to drive the proverbial truck through. When a state budget does pass, it may contain either a 2% or 4% property tax “freeze,” but won’t limit increases in total municipal spending.
So if the state won’t do it, how about citizens everywhere working for their own local Taxpayer Bill of Rights?
Wisconsin doesn’t allow statewide, citizen-initiated referendums. But statutes do allow – and are very specific about – a group of citizens to petition their city or village via direct legislation. And that’s just what I and a couple of stalwart taxpayer advocates did in 1996.
Section 9.20 of the state statutes allows for direct legislation:
9.20 (1) A number of electors equal to at least 15% of the votes cast for governor at the last general election in their city or village may sign and file a petition with the city or village clerk requesting that an attached proposed … resolution… either be adopted by the common council or village board or be referred to a vote of the electors.
And here’s how the SUMMARY of my “mini-TABOR” Petition for Direct Legislation read:
The total Tax Levy for the City of Appleton shall not increase by more than the rate of inflation plus an allowance for growth, without a ¾ vote of the Common Council.
The actual proposed budget ordinance appeared on the petition as well. Its language is pretty complex – but not excessively long – just over 100 words. If you’re interested in the specifics, send me a quick note and I’ll send you the verbage.
Here’s what the ordinance means, in plain English:
Total revenues available to be spent by the city cannot increase by more than inflation plus 60% of new construction, unless a budget containing such an increase is passed by a ¾ vote of the Common Council.
That’s quite a liberal spending standard – inflation plus 60% of new growth. Standards suggested in recent state discussions suggest a limit of inflation only or growth in average personal income. Note that the Appleton limit applies to fees and shared revenues, as well as property taxes, thereby limiting a city’s ability to raise permit fees, for example, as a substitute to higher taxes.
The ordinance we initially proposed over 10 years ago has now been part of Appleton’s Municipal Code for 10 years. I call it the TLO – the Tax Levy Ordinance.
It was a huge struggle to get passed (more on that later), but we did it!!!
Will you? I’ll share everything you’ll need to get “mini-Taxpayer Bill of Rights” passed in your community. E-mail me... In that the state won't do it - a few hearty workers throughout the state could really make a difference in Wisconsin’s onerous tax burden. Jo Egelhoff, FoxPolitics.net
COMMENTS
Most corporations operating in Wisconsin pay ZERO income taxes. That sounds terrible to me. Further for a company the size of MillerCoors please show us how Wisconsin's "terrible" taxes impact shareholder values... by what, a penny? What are your sources? When "major corporations" don't pay taxes, it's because subsidiary corp.'s and partnerships are paying taxes instead. Got to get the whole story... JE

daver (Wed Oct 17 05:25:52 2007)
TABOR is a an ineffective response to failed government and failed leadership. It is an immature response to our seeming inability to find solutions in a polarized political environment. It sends us all to the woodshed because we lack the maturity and emotional intelligence to find the path out of the swamp. Its inherent ridigity is its greatest vulnerability. We live in a fluid environment that resists the sort of structure that TABOR requires. People who struggle with ambiguity and find constant change a challenge will love TABOR. It makes life simple. You're darn right I struggle with ambiguity, shifting objectives and unwillingness to prioritize. TABOR provides firm fiscal goals and discipline that all understand. Sure, prioritizing is tough - and folks with differing principles, prioritize completely differently. Yet we've got this funny little thing called democracy (or a Republic) that has worked pretty well for 230 years to ultimately determine those priorities. JE

Bob Pedersen (Wed Oct 17 09:59:58 2007)
I'm really impressed with your work on passing a local TABOR, Jo. I would also mention, in response to daver's comments above, that corporations/businesses do not pay taxes: People pay taxes. The people who own and work for profit-making organizations have money taken out of their paychecks when government levies taxes on their value-making work. Many people don't look at it like that, even though it's the truth.

Richard Lorenc (Thu Oct 18 11:36:51 2007)
You failed to mention that, in November 2005, Colorado residents voted to suspend for five years the revenue caps imposed by their TABOR law. Did you simply run out of room for that fact? Or do you instead believe that Colorado's politicians are smarter than her people?

Sean Duffey (Tue Oct 23 13:33:31 2007)
While I don't necessarily like TABOR and obviously Colorado didn't either, it has opened a healthy debate on how to control costs in state and local governments.
Bob Pederson seems to think that TABOR is being suggested because our legislators are immature and political in nature. He's right but how do you change that attitude except by doing what Jo has suggested and forcing the hand of our representatives. If you have a better idea Bob, then you should express your thoughts unless you are satisfied with the taxes that are levied by the state and local governments. Even not-for-profits have to prioritize instead of passing it along to the taxpayer. That's what Jo is asking. If you have a better idea then let's hear it!

Mike Thomas (Mon Aug 18 14:20:20 2008)
When a family has a financial problem, one of the best things to do is to cut up credit cards, and decide what is really NEEDED (Starbucks coffee would have to go). It would be nice if government operated the same way.
Imagine: pay only for what NEEDS to be done, like roads, sheriffs, fire protection...and cut out the rest. Unfortunately, all most people can think of is to extend the "credit lines" by increasing taxes. They misunderstand that PRIVATE charities will always outdo government charities, and keep on thinking "we need X,Y,Z programs."
Just like the homeowner facing foreclosure that HAS to keep on having his Starbucks.

EMILY MATTHEWS (Tue Aug 19 11:44:12 2008)
|
 |


Blog Archives
| 2010 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Solberg: Healing After an Abortion
• Basketball fans eyeing extension of Miller Park sales tax
• Nanny sex-ed bill goes to Doyle
• A first. Village limits pension contribution for employees
• Nanny State update: Toothbrushing mandated
• Obama pushes education inflation
• WI Investment Board votes to borrow to juice up returns
• So Republicans have brought nothing to the table?
• You have got to be kidding me
• Nygren: Governor Continues Terms of Failure in State of the State
• Sen. Fitzgerald: Governor down the wrong track at high speed
• Phosphorus is the new CO2. $Billions in Wisconsin
• More Obama giveaways
• A reprimand? Would you keep him on the job?
• Burri: Sarah Palin for Prez troubles me
• Quote of the Day – Obama after the pie-eating contest
• Populism, abused and trampled
• Fitzgerald: Senate Republicans Propose Real Job Creation Agenda
• Stripped down health insurance – it’s about time
• Ok GOP, scrap the Party of NO; time to lead
• No way Feingold is a Coakley. Is Wall a Brown?
• Burri: Conservatives off the chart for a RINO?
• Paltry quid pro quo?
• Doyle says ARRA has ‘created or retained’ 44,000 WI jobs
• Does most of the public fall for this stuff?
• When you get signatures, always get a couple extra
• Blame it on the outmoded computers
• Scott Brown victory does not scuttle health bill
• 8th Congressional Candidate Forum, Jan. 25
• Scott Walker Meet-and-greet, Monday, Jan. 18
• Aren’t consumers taxpayers too?
• MORE taxes on investment income - dreadful and wrong
• Join the blaze orange army and say ‘Enough is Enough’
• The future of government-run health care
• Tax on banks is a really bad idea
• Roth, Savard on the stump, grassroots style
• Savard speaking in Appleton, 8 PM, Wed., Jan. 13.
• Rahmlow: Savard, Bies frontrunners for State Senate
• Burri: Failing Political Correctness 101
• School contracts and Race to the Top
• Senator Feingold worrisome and big red flags
• Psephological?
• This is really important. Contact Rep. Kagen. Now. Please.
• This is exactly what we need from Governor Doyle
• This guy is my hero
• Why am I not surprised?
• Talk health reform with Feingold (Th), Petri (today)
• Give the Mayor power over MPS - if he can break contracts
• Burri: Yup, Dems really are going to bypass a conference
• The $2.7 billion Wisconsin deficit no one told you about
• Walker launches county accountability website
• Rahmlow: Why is Van Hollen dodging the Nebraska deal?
|
| 2009 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
• The Lawton-Bader files
• Yup, it’s the TAX LEVY, not the tax RATE
• Ellis: costly automobile insurance laws must be rolled back
• If not Barrett, who?
• The subsidy game
• Burri: Bailouts, Banks, Health Care, and the Mob
• Attend Appleton Schools budget meeting tonight
• A public option WON’T increase costs? That’s delusional!
• Appleton Schools budget meeting Monday
• Wisconsin should be screaming for accountability
• Burri: If anything, we need more obstructionism around here
• WI on the leading edge - in the wrong direction
• Rep. Montgomery: Utility Customers Join State’s Crime-Fighting Efforts
• Public Conservation and Recreation Lands Total 16.5% of State
• In the crow's nest of the Titanic, shouting 'Iceberg!'
• Is Rep. Nelson a political hack?
• Health care: The road ahead will be brutal
• Kagen's pandering again
• Birthers - good stuff for you
• How much do we bend over backward for seniors?
• The trouble with health care is paying for it
• Two-parent families: The Gold Standard
• Burri: Kids... the joys and blessings
• Very, very worried about health care
• Rep. Huebsch: Wisconsin is proof government health care isn’t the answer
• School district contracts push up tax levy
• What? Obama, the Peace Prize?
• TODAY - hearing on Campaign Finance Reform
• Appleton School District tax levy up way too much
• CBO report is out - and the bill isn't even written yet?
• So, how much do YOU budget for health care?
• Burri: Copenhagen trip was amateurish
• “Sotomayor, you have blood on your hands...”
• Cap and Trade. Always follow the money
• Rep. Kagen gets (almost) free health services
• I actually agree with Rep. Kagen
• Future Wisconsin Conference for Conservatives, October 10, Wauwatosa
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2008 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
• Important votes Tuesday, including Appleton Common Council
• Democrats are becoming supply siders??
• Further debunking Hillary myths
• WEAC has created an unsustainable monopoly
• From Mark Gundrum: One of the greatest honors an American can experience
• 'Operation Chaos' working?
• Joe Martin the best candidate in Appleton's 8th
• State programs to cut? - Volume II
• Oh the naivete of youth
• Not just disingenuous - flat wrong
• Steve - you will be missed
• Make cuts only AFTER you're elected....
• Getting serious: What programs can we cut?
• Rep. Steve Kagen joining me on Jerry Bader Show today
• Rep. Van Roy: Dental Care Pilot Program
• Has Dave Obey turned the corner on earmarks?
• Speaker Huebsch: Governor turns down Federal Aid?
• Mark Rahmlow: "We're Broke."
• As taxpayers, how do we know if it's a Chevy or a Lexus?
• This is trash talk - about a veteran
• Frank Lasee: Take time to get the Compact right
• 'The Gableman Ad' - is it racist?
• Roth thankful, Kagen shaking money tree
• Gov. Doyle's office not enamored with Freedom of Information
• Governor Doyle will never do it
• Leadership on smoking ban? Not Hanna
• Rep. Van Roy speaks out about smear ads
• You're threatening me about potholes?
• Losing the Hastert seat is NOT a trend and NOT curtians for the GOP
• First suggestion for 'slashing' programs
• Big money-saver for municipalities
• More one time fixes. Nuts.
• Any chances???
• I'm doing the Jerry Bader Show, today, the 11th
• Representative Frank Lasee: Final Waltz of the Season
• Guest Blog: It's not the county's business to be in the nursing home business
• Yup, Hillary won Texas and Ohio
• Gableman/Butler race featured - and it isn't pretty
• Lies from Planned Parenthood and NARAL
• He who sacrifices liberty.....
• Duh.
• The Troha sentencing, Doyle and that $200K
• Guns, passion and "originality"
• How hard is it anyway, to shut down a government program?
• Voting is a PRIVILEGE. And so are property taxes....
• Guest Blog: Governor Doyle, cancel your Ireland trip
|
 February
|
 January
|
| 2007 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
 August
|
 July
|
 June
|
 May
|
 April
|
 March
|
 February
|
 January
• Lots of ideas. No money.
• The Cigarette Tax - "Poor Policy Instrument?"
• School budget Lite?
• Frankenstein - not in the library, but in the legislature
• A librarian, a legislator, a president
• $1.25/pack - NO, NO, NO, and NO
• Kagen and Reagan in the same breath?
• Menasha: behind the 8-ball, but not biting the dust
• Any way you slice it, Wisconsin government wants (further) in on health care
• The World is Flat...what about health care?
• The PAC - too precious to fail. Day 3
• News follow-ups: Appleton West, Kagen at the White House
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail - Day 2
• Fox Cities PAC - too precious to fail
• New Transit Tax coming your way
• Rep. Petri has his finger in the dike - I guess
• AASD Retirement Costs Burdensome
• Health care, health care, health care, health care
• Water rate increase was no slam dunk
• Education for all is just a bad dream
• New Year's resolutions from a parade snob
|
| 2006 |
 December
|
 November
|
 October
|
 September
|
| 2000 |
 May
|
|